|
2001 Crop Falling Short
With the exception
of a few areas, most growers report that their crops are not picking
out as expected. Some growers speculate that the state crop could
fall as low as 75,000 or 85,000 tons, although most talk of a crop
in the 100,000 to 120,000 ton range. This compares to a PMC crop
estimate of 150,000 tons in June. Sugar levels are reported high,
but bin weights are lower than normal. Dry-away ratios are favorable.
Some areas report higher than normal offgrade.
The crop is heaviest
in parts of the San Joaquin Valley and in parts of the north Sacramento
Valley. The crop is reported very light in the south Sacramento
Valley region. One crop insurance adjuster reports that 75% of their
clients are not harvesting at least one of their blocks in the region.
Growers report that in some orchards it is taking 100 trees to fill
one bin.
Industry Shipments Up 6%
Industry shipments
finished out the market year up 10,000 tons from last year. Increases
came from government purchases, an increase in domestic pitted prune
shipments, and a 7% gain in exports. The largest gains were made
in Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, and China. Total industry shipments
amounted to 164,700 natural condition tons.
Advertising Boosts
Sales
The California Dried Plum
Board tested various combinations of promotion tools in 6 markets
this past spring. A combination of radio advertising, sampling,
public relations, and shopping cart ads helped boost dried plum
sales by 6.1% in selected markets.
Radio advertising by itself
boosted sales 3.5%. Sampling and PR together by themselves gave
a 1.6% increase. Shopping cart ads by themselves showed no increase
in overall sales.
The CDPB will run radio ads in the Denver market this fall, and
in the Metropolitan New York market in the Spring. Ads will also
run in the Seattle market in the Spring if crop tonnage generates
sufficient funding.
USDA Tree-Pull Rule-Making in Progress
The USDA has started rule making procedures to
act on the industrys request for $17 million in matching funds
to remove up to a total of 20,000 acres of prunes between the joint
PBA/Sunsweet program and a proposed USDA tree-pull program. The
joint PBA/Sunsweet program is the source of the industrys
$3 million matching contribution promised to USDA. While there are
no guarantees that USDA will award $17 million, or any amount, to
the industry, it is a good sign that they are now expediting rule-making
procedures.
Potentially the USDA program will pay more per
tree, however, the draft USDA rules include plant-back restrictions,
production history, and other requirements not included in the PBA/Sunsweet
program. If the USDA program makes it through the rule making procedure,
it is anticipated that grower sign-ups would begin in mid-October,
and trees must be removed by the end of February.
|
Orchard Renewal Program Underway
PBA and Sunsweet have teamed up to form a joint program to reduce
prune acreage, and this years crop, by encouraging growers
to remove non-economic orchards without harvesting. The program
is named orchard renewal because it reflects the fact that over
20,000 acres were planted more than 30 years ago and many growers
would be removing those orchards and replanting in the next few
years if they could afford it.
The program provides an incentive of $4.50 per qualifying tree
to growers who are willing to move up their orchard renewal plans
by a few years. It is hoped that many growers will choose to replant
to other crops, since a good balance for the industry would be around
80,000 total acres (70,000 bearing and 10,000 non-bearing), compared
to the current total of about 100,000 acres. About 3,500 acres will
be pulled by the joint PBA/Sunsweet program deadline of September
30. Orchards participating in the program must remain unharvested.
The PBA intends to finance its share of the joint program from
service fees paid by packers. Independent packers have signed a
PBA Handler Service Fee Agreement to pay $20 per salable ton to
the PBA on all the tonnage they handle in 2001. While these service
fees can be used for any purpose deemed appropriate by the PBA Board,
these fees will be placed in a trust account which will be used
to fund the Orchard Renewal Program. This trust fund will be administered
by a joint committee of PBA and Sunsweet representatives.
We would like to recognize the following independent packers who
have agreed to pay the service fee to PBA: Cal Fruit, Cal Prune,
Hill View Packing, Mariani Packing, Miki Orchard, National Raisin,
Premier Valley Foods, Sacramento Packing, Shoei Foods, Stapleton
Spence, Timber Crest Farms, and Valley View Packing. Together with
Sunsweet, these companies represent over 93% of the industry tonnage.
2001 PBA Price Objectives
There has been a good deal of pessimism this year regarding the
feasibility of establishing a negotiated price agreement. However,
the reduced production and positive steps taken by the industry
to address oversupply suggest that establishing a price is possible
and will be beneficial to both growers and packers.
The following are PBA pricing objectives that respond to current
conditions:
- Price the 2001 crop to reflect market conditions, but consider
the positive effects of a shorter than anticipated crop.
- Adjust price to reflect supply of large prunes and consider
better than expected sales of smaller sizes.
- Establish a legitimate basis for growers and packers to do business
and work towards making it more difficult for the bottom
feeders" to influence trade prices.
- Restore stability to field prices so increases can be achieved
when supply is balanced.
- Restore confidence in the industry so the "lower the price"
mentality can be changed.
|
|
Editorially Speaking
Neill Mitchell, PBA President
The Prune Bargaining Association has made a strong
effort over the years to be mindful of points of view that are different
from our own. We have been willing to recognize that our packers
have to be successful in order for growers to maintain profitability.
I think that even when contentious issues are
being debated we have always recognized that those on the opposite
side have every right to protect their perceived self-interest.
It is then particularly unfortunate that a couple of the packers
opposed to the green diversion program have made it clear that they
believe that the PBA, and growers in general, had no right to support
anything that they opposed.
On the other hand, some of the packers opposed
to the green diversion have stepped up to the plate to make the
tree pull, which was the favored alternative to the drop, work.
Sal Rubino, of Valley View Packing, who was probably the most vocal
opponent of the green drop, was the first to come forward to support
the tree pull and put up his money. Jaswant Bains deserves much
credit for his work to bring about a compromise and be the reasonable
voice during the discussions. We thank them both.
SOME MEMORABLE QUOTES
"We got screwed last year, so I dont
care what happens to the (prune) growers."
This bit of wisdom attributed to a small packer
that evidently believes that it is the growers fault that
he has problems. The fact is, the PBA and prune packers set a price
that gives everyone a level playing field. Once that price is set,
a packer must compete with other packers, not growers. This same
packer has proclaimed that he will never sign another price agreement.
I would suggest that those rascally growers that have been selling
to him look elsewhere for a buyer in the future unless they are
willing to pay for his inability to compete.
"I will probably sign the tree pull agreement
if the government program comes through".
This from a packer who was supportive of the
program when he was arguing against the green diversion plan, but
has since invented numerous reasons why he shouldnt pay up.
The PBA and Sunsweet have literally jumped through
hoops to satisfy this packers concerns, but with every move
to address a perceived problem come additional demands. We continue
to try to work with this guy because when one packer refuses to
do his agreed part, it places an additional burden on those who
do.
"Were not doing that through the
packing company
thats our dryer company".
This gem from a packer, who is said to be offering
"green prune" contracts for $60.00, when asked if he realized
the damage that would result from a ridiculously low price level.
We have no problem with the fresh juice processors offering less
than market prices for prunes that will not affect the dried prune
supply, but offers of less than half the real value for prunes to
be dried are predatory and will ultimately affect market prices
which are already artificially low. We hope that growers will reject
any offers that are less than reasonable whether they come from
a "packing company" or a "dryer".
We will continue to monitor and report the statements
of wit and wisdom attributed to those who evidently cant see
a future for the prune business. As always, we welcome your comments
and will gladly provide this space to anyone with an opposing view
as well as anyone that wishes to criticize my ramblings.
Copyright ©2001, all rights reserved. Distribution
by permission only.
Subscriptions are $395 per year, and provided as a free service to
PBA members, signatory packers, and sponsors.
335 Teegarden Ave, Ste B, Yuba City, CA 95991. Phone 530-674-5636
FAX 530-674-3804. |